Return to the BRG response overview

Introduction / Overview

1. The Business Rules Metamodel ~ Background
 
  • Developed originally as a GUIDE project deliverable
  • Published in 1995; revised in 1997
  • Widely-adopted (defacto) standard for the definition of a "business rule"
  • Uses the Zachman Framework as a context
    • specifically "row-3" (the I/S Perspective)
  • The Business Rules Group (the model's original author) continues to evolve and expand these definitions
    • more information: www.evergreen.edu/businessRules/
2. The Business Rules Group & the MDC
 
  • The Business Rules Group (BRG) reviewed the MDC Business Rules metamodel at our last working meeting (Aug. 1999).
    • Our members agreed to provide a response to the MDC.
  • Contact was made with Thomas Bergstraesser (Microsoft), who invited us to attend today's meeting.
    • objective: understand the format & timing of our response
  • An invitation has been extended to the MDC to attend our next working meeting
    • Orlando, FL, in conjunction with the WRAD conference
    • February 2000
3. Feedback and Initial Review
 
  • Terry Moriarty (a BRG member) was asked by Microsoft to review the MDC Business Rules submodel.
    • Her independent response was provided to Microsoft/MDC and was used by the BRG to prepare this response.
  • We have begun to compile a point-by-point response to the MDC Business Rules model (Review Draft 7/15/99).
    • Some initial comments are provided here.
    • The notation of the BRG metamodel is represented here in UML form for ease of comparison.
  • Our current work has developed a metamodel that covers several of the constructs in the MDC Business Engineering Model (e.g., Goal, Objective, Mission, Vision, etc.).
    • Our input on these constructs is also relevant.